When can a statement made by an accused not be used as evidence in court?

The correct answer to when a statement made by an accused cannot be used as evidence in court is if it is not voluntarily given. In legal contexts, for a statement to be admissible as evidence, it must have been made willingly and without coercion, threats, or undue pressure. If an accused person is compelled to make a statement through fear, intimidation, or deception, that statement is typically considered involuntary and cannot be used in court due to the fundamental rights protecting individuals from self-incrimination and ensuring due process.

This principle is rooted in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against themselves. Courts uphold these standards to ensure the integrity of the legal process and to protect individuals from being forced into making confessions or statements that do not reflect their true intentions.

The other options provided, while they may relate to specific circumstances under which evidence is considered, do not have the same foundational legal implications as the necessity for a statement to be voluntarily given. Therefore, the requirement for voluntary statements remains a key aspect in determining the admissibility of evidence in a court of law.