Which of the following describes a good technique when assessing statements from suspects?

Confronting with evidence is a crucial technique when assessing statements from suspects because it involves presenting them with tangible proof that contradicts what they claim. This strategy can elicit a more truthful response as it may prompt a suspect to reassess their narrative in light of the evidence. When a suspect is confronted with facts they cannot deny, it often leads to inconsistencies being revealed, further investigation opportunities, and can facilitate confessions or admissions of guilt.

In criminal investigations, effective interrogation relies on the careful balance of pressure and rapport. Confronting suspects with evidence not only tests the credibility of their statements but also builds a foundation for further questioning. This technique reinforces the integrity of the investigation and often helps in discerning truth from fabrication, ultimately guiding investigators toward the right conclusions based on the evidence at hand.